Woman Sues Former Partner Over His Lottery Win

Woman Sues Former Partner Over His Lottery Win

What happens when a lottery win turns really sour and the money that was supposed to bring joy and happiness corrupts the people that win it, and in turn destroys the lives of the people they love around them? This is one such story, and the dramatic case continues. Read on to find out about the women who sues her former partner over his lottery win.

Denise Robertson and Maurice Thibeault’s Story

This stranger than fiction story is exactly what occurred when Ontario based couple Denise Robertson and Maurice Thibeault, won $6 million on the Canadian Lotto 649. Back on 20th September 2017 Thibeault, knowing how much the couple had won, packed a bag, took his belongings and vanished from the home the couple shared, without telling his partner, Denise.

Court Injunction Followed

After his disappearance, Robertson, 46 lodged a court injunction which has frozen the huge pay out until the matter can be successfully resolved between her lawyers, Thibeault and the Ontario Lottery Regulator.

A pre-prepared statement issued by the law firm, handling Roberston’s case was issued and in it she stated “I am greatly saddened and disappointed by what has happened here. This could have been a very happy and exciting time for us as a couple to do things we could only dream of doing.”

Robertson had actually discovered Thibeault has gone strange and bizarre lengths to keep the lottery win a total secret and prevent her from taking a share of the money.

The brave lady outlined the fact that the couple had always bought their lottery tickets and agreed that if a winning ticket was purchased that the proceeds would be split between them as a couple.

On the day the draw was made, she heard on the local radio station they always tuned into that one of the winning tickets had been purchased in their home town of Chatham.

On telling Thibeault about it, he assured them that they hadn’t won – and also said the same to their friends and loved ones. Robertson thought no more about it and let the matter drop.

On the morning of September 25th this year, as usual, Thibeault left for work. During the day Robertson repeatedly tried to contact him via text, but received no response to her messages.

When she returned home that night she discovered he’d removed all his belongings, including clothes and toiletries – and that his Canadian passport had also been taken too.

Denise Robertson and Maurice Thibeault

Thibeault Messages His Employers

In the meantime, Thibeault had contacted his employers, saying he wouldn’t be coming back into work anymore and sending them a picture of the winning lottery ticket which he had actually bought and lied about.

It was then the story was uncovered when a friend of Robertsons shared the rumor that theirs was the winning ticket.

A text from Thibeault to his boss was recovered in which he said that he and Robertson were no longer together.

In her statement she also said that she feared Thibeault would leave the country, and therefore she would not get the portion of the winnings she was owed.

A spokesperson for the Ontario Lottery Group indeed confirmed that an injunction had been slapped on the ticket and that the payout had been frozen until the matter could be resolved and the rightful people got their winnings.

It is a story that has got many people talking, with many taking the side of Robertson.

“I think he owes her $3 million, its life-changing money,” said Dakota Hodgson of Chatham

Whilst Chatham’s Clair Culliford remarked that the whole tale was terrible and she wouldn’t fault Robertson for taking action to recover money that was hers. “Morally, he should give her some. He should avoid the court action.” she added.

Case Goes to Court

Now Robertson is hoping that a jury will help her claim the $3 million that has been stuck in legal limbo since the case came to light.

Denise Robertson filed a statement of claim against Maurice Thibeault in a Windsor Court. The claim was for “breach of trust, unjust enrichment, conversion, deceit and general damages”

Robertson’s lawyer, Steve Pickard, said she is also seeking a declaration that she is the owner of half of the winnings. Alongside this, she’s claiming $500,000 in damages and that also Thibeault covers her court costs. The same lawyer has also asked for the matter to be tried by jury.

In her sworn affidavit, she says “’Together we dreamed about winning the lotto. We both love muscle cars, we would each buy one and buy a large property in the country and build a large shop to work on our cars.”

Her lawyer commented that “I think it’s more appropriate that this kind of case is heard by a jury because it is something that touches on… what the standards of morality are and what the community wants their law to be,”

Robertson still maintains they had an agreement to share any lottery winnings. A claim Thibeault denies.

In response, Thibeault’s lawyer claims “This is no more complicated than a game of bingo. He purchased a ticket, he won the ticket, he has claimed the prize. He is a good and honest man and what is at stake here is his reputation.”

Robertson also alleges that she and Thibeault had been in a common law relationship and buying Lotto 6/49 tickets together. They had also been splitting any winnings for years.

After an investigation by the Ontario Lottery and Gaming Commission, half the money was paid to Thibeault. A photo was released of him holding up a cheque for $3,073,361.30 on January 5th 2018. The other half of the win will be temporarily handed over to Ontario Superior Court, according to OLG spokesperson Rui Brum.

Maurice Thibeault

​”It really is the only option [to get the money],” said Pickard. “In this particular case we think … a jury is going to agree that he should not be keeping the winnings and that Denise Robertson is truly entitled as the owner of half of that ticket.”

The case continues.

  1. The only reason why they want a jury (the ex girlfriend’s lawyers) is so that they can attempt to manipulate the jury and paint the boyfriend as the bad guy in this even though he did nothing wrong. If this woman is at least a little bit smart, she will take a minor settlement (100K – assuming he will even offer it or any for that matter) just to let the dispute be done and over with as she’s clearly in the wrong here. I hope the guy wins.

    00
  2. They are not married so she shouldn’t be getting a dime

    00
  3. They were in a common law relationship and it’s only fair it was split. I guarantee if the roles were reversed HE would be going after the money too. And rightly so.
    Pretty obvious he tried to cheat her out of it.
    They are both owed half and should split it.. and yes I’d say that even if the roles were reversed.

    00
    • Ok, so what happens if two-men, not even talking about two homosexuals, are living together in the same arrangement? Does guy A get to sue guy B over lottery winnings because they lived together and are considered common law? This woman and man don’t even have kids and she expects a payday. I hope he wins and further to that, I hope he sues her for damages on top of it all when it’s all over. She needs to be made an example of. There’s no proof of her claims that they agreed, and believe me, the few screenshots of so-called evidence, weren’t even evidence of anything! LOL, the text shows a conversation with him basically not saying much, but she’ll try to suck him dry anyways. Poor guy, what a gigantic pain in the ass this must be.

      00
  4. If the genders were reversed, I don’t think this story would be in the news cycle. People would tell him to not “live off a woman” and “get a job”.

    They were not married, shacking up is not the same thing.

    HE bought the ticket
    SHE did not buy the ticket
    SHE has no proof of them buying together
    SHE has no proof of a written or verbal contract saying they would split lotto winnings

    Speculation here but maybe if she treated him better she would have kept the man and the money and quite frankly why should she be entitled to his money just because they were roommates that smashed naughty bits?

    00
    • What if you have two men who are roommates and technically-considered common-law? Does the one roommate get to claim ownership of half of the wealth? What if the man and woman were simply friends and nothing more? They don’t even have children for crying out loud. Any honest person with an honest heart can see what is *most likely* going on here, obviously conjecture on my part, but the woman is a leech and the guy probably had enough of her BS and took off once he got the good news that he had finally caught a bit of a break in life. I can almost guarantee that their relationship was probably already borderline dead at that point.

      Also, what’s with the passport comment? He had moved out, why would he leave an important piece of personal documentation behind? The ex-girlfriend makes a few mistakes which clearly paints her as someone trying to exploit an ex-partner. This is sick.

      00

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

I accept the Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.

You May Like: